Southern Illinois
Men -
Women
2012
-
2013 -
2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
284 |
Nick Schrader |
JR |
32:29 |
347 |
Oscar Medina |
SO |
32:40 |
364 |
Zach Dahleen |
SR |
32:41 |
402 |
Brian Dixon |
SR |
32:46 |
756 |
Juan Carrera |
SO |
33:28 |
852 |
T.J. Heffernan |
SR |
33:37 |
1,177 |
Cole Allison |
JR |
34:06 |
1,593 |
Evan Ehrenheim |
JR |
34:41 |
|
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
1.1% |
Top 10 in Regional |
84.6% |
Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Nick Schrader |
Oscar Medina |
Zach Dahleen |
Brian Dixon |
Juan Carrera |
T.J. Heffernan |
Cole Allison |
Evan Ehrenheim |
Notre Dame Invitational (Blue) |
10/04 |
915 |
32:19 |
32:37 |
32:52 |
32:20 |
33:39 |
|
35:25 |
|
Pre-National Invitational (Blue) |
10/19 |
913 |
32:36 |
32:47 |
32:23 |
32:43 |
32:52 |
33:31 |
|
|
Missouri Valley Championships |
11/02 |
901 |
32:27 |
32:32 |
32:25 |
32:51 |
33:01 |
33:28 |
33:44 |
34:41 |
Midwest Region Championships |
11/15 |
1047 |
32:37 |
32:43 |
33:19 |
33:15 |
35:36 |
33:57 |
33:54 |
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.0% |
31.0 |
749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
Region Championship |
100% |
9.1 |
270 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
0.9 |
2.9 |
9.8 |
20.0 |
31.8 |
18.9 |
9.1 |
3.8 |
1.7 |
0.6 |
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Nick Schrader |
0.3% |
135.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oscar Medina |
0.0% |
148.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zach Dahleen |
0.0% |
209.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian Dixon |
0.0% |
146.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Juan Carrera |
0.0% |
246.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T.J. Heffernan |
0.0% |
238.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cole Allison |
0.0% |
241.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Nick Schrader |
33.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
1.2 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
1.9 |
2.1 |
2.5 |
3.0 |
2.7 |
3.2 |
Oscar Medina |
42.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
1.1 |
1.2 |
1.4 |
Zach Dahleen |
44.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
Brian Dixon |
49.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
Juan Carrera |
87.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T.J. Heffernan |
96.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cole Allison |
126.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
4 |
0.3% |
7.7% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.2 |
|
0.0 |
4 |
5 |
0.9% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
5 |
6 |
2.9% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
6 |
7 |
9.8% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
7 |
8 |
20.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
31.8% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.8 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
18.9% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
9.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
3.8% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
1.7% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
Florida State |
67.8% |
1.0 |
0.7 |
Butler |
1.4% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Virginia Tech |
1.2% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Lamar |
0.2% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Penn State |
0.2% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Lipscomb |
0.1% |
2.0 |
0.0 |
Georgia Tech |
0.0% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
|
Total |
|
|
0.7 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
3.0 |